
COMPLIANCE STANDARD CS P20:
The institution employs competent faculty members qualified
to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution.
When determining acceptable qualifications of its faculty,
an institution gives primary consideration to the highest
earned degree in the discipline in accord with the guidelines
listed. The institution also considers competence, effectiveness,
and capacity, including, as appropriate, undergraduate and
graduate degrees, related work experiences in the field,
professional licensure and certifications, honors and awards,
continuous documented excellence in teaching, or other demonstrated
competencies and achievements that contribute to effective
teaching and student learning outcomes. For all cases, the
institution is responsible for justifying and documenting
the qualifications of all its faculty. (See “Credential
Guidelines” in Principles for Accreditation.)
o |
Compliance |
X |
Partial Compliance |
o |
Non-Compliance |
The Collin County Community College District's (CCCCD) policy
and intent is to employ competent faculty qualified to accomplish
the mission and goals of the District. The District has
completed a comprehensive review of faculty credentials
for the target semesters and found that it is in partial
compliance with the Credential Guidelines for this compliance
standard (Reference 1).
Justification and Explanation for Partial Compliance:
As the District progressed through its comprehensive review
of faculty credentials, some faculty members, primarily
part-time, were identified with academic preparation that
was insufficient based on the District’s policy and hiring
guidelines (References 2, 3), which
mirror the requirements of the Southern Association of Colleges
and Schools (SACS). These faculty members had been employed
based
on documentation of exceptional experience, in lieu of the
requisite education. However, after a careful review by
academic administrators, it was determined that the District’s
standards for “exceptional experience” were being interpreted
and applied inconsistently throughout the academic divisions.
Summary reports identifying the faculty members with
exceptional experience in lieu of the required degree are
provided for each of the three target semesters (Reference 4).
Action Plan for Compliance:
The District will continue its efforts to hire only faculty
with the required academic background. Faculty member(s)
with skills in workforce areas where advanced degrees are
not offered will continue to be considered on a rare exceptional
basis, as will faculty member(s) with documented specialized
skills and/or certifications, but only after the District
has been unsuccessful in identifying individual(s) who hold
the required academic degrees, following a good-faith effort
to advertise the position(s) within the relevant labor market.
Comprehensive documentation of the exceptional and compelling
case for consideration of exemplary experience in lieu of
complete education will be reviewed for each individual.
This documentation will include a detailed resume, thorough
reference checks, relevant transcripts, and a review of
the individual’s professional work (e.g. artists, musicians,
etc.) Associate faculty members hired based on exceptional experience
are approved for only one semester. Re-employment may only
be approved upon receipt of new justification that a good
faith effort to identify an individual with the required
academic background has been unsuccessful.
Further, using the Commission on College’s guidelines for
providing justification for faculty without the required
credentials in computer
science, information technology, accounting, and emerging
disciplines, CCCCD will broaden its review of student outcomes
data each semester to incorporate a District-wide comparison
and its analysis of overall outcomes in courses taught by
faculty hired on an exception basis as compared to the
performance of students in courses taught by all other faculty
(e.g., those meeting the traditional academic requirements.)
To demonstrate the District’s commitment to these
principles, a report (Reference 5) will be presented by the
academic deans to their peers in an Academic Deans meeting at
the beginning of each semester detailing a) the efforts made
to identify a faculty member with the appropriate academic
qualifications, and b) a thorough review of the exceptional
experience and credentials that formed the basis for the
decision to employ the part-time faculty member on an
exceptional basis. The Vice Presidents will then present a
status report regarding faculty credentials at the Leadership
Team meeting each September and February.
At the end of each semester, the academic deans will prepare
and forward to the appropriate Vice President a report detailing
a comparison of student outcomes in classes taught by the
faculty member(s) with exceptional experience compared to
faculty members with traditional qualifications. Based on
the findings of these comparisons, steps will be taken to
refine the standards used by the academic deans in considering
any exceptions in future semesters.
These processes will improve both accountability and consistency:
to limit the numbers of exceptions requested and heighten
the standards for considering such requests throughout the
District.
Timetable for Compliance:
The District commits to be in compliance with its action
plan not later than the beginning of the 2004-2005 academic
year.
September 14, 2004 |
Each academic dean will present the
first report regarding faculty credentials for their
respective division to the Academic Deans. |
September 27, 2004 |
The Vice Presidents will present these
status reports to the Leadership Team. |
October 1, 2004 |
The Vice Presidents’ reports will be
submitted to SACS to document the first component of the
District’s action plan for meeting this compliance
standard. |
February 8, 2005 |
The academic deans will present the
Spring semester reports. This presentation will also
include a report on the initial analysis of the fall
student outcomes data as well as recommendations for any
changes to the district's faculty hiring and credential
review processes. |
February 21, 2005 |
The Vice Presidents will present the
status report and their recommendations to the
Leadership Team for review and consideration. |
March 10, 2005 |
The Vice Presidents' reports and
documentation of related decisions/actions taken by the
Leadership Team will be submitted to SACS. |
Supporting Documents:
|